Showing posts with label T. S. Eliot. Show all posts
Showing posts with label T. S. Eliot. Show all posts

Friday, September 11, 2026

Aimé Césaire / Saint-John Perse


Pablo Picasso: Négre Portrait d'Aimé Césaire (1949)


Earlier this year, I wrote a series of posts about foreign-language poets in English. The emphasis there was on the actual process of translation. In each case I presented a single canonical text in a series of different versions, and discussed the diverse emphases of the resulting poems.

I found it a very enjoyable project but, when it was over, I realised how much remained to be said about the subject: in particular, how to do justice to a few of the other fascinating poets I'd been forced to leave out by the exigencies of the exercise.

I've already put up a post about two important twentieth-century Italian poets, Umberto Saba and Giuseppe Ungaretti, focussing (this time) on their respective politics. Saba, a homosexual Jew, was discriminated against and finally forced into hiding by the Fascist regime, as it grew ever closer to the Nazis in Germany.

The hyper-masculine Ungaretti, by contrast, welcomed Mussolini's march on Rome and was a vociferous supporter of Fascism throughout the 1920s. After living abroad in Brazil for much of the 1930s, he returned to Italy in 1942, and was given a hero's welcome by the authorities. These fascist sympathies resulted in his dismissal from the University of Rome at the end of the war, but he was reinstated shortly afterwards.


T. S. Eliot: Four Quartets (1940-42)


The question is, should such historical facts have an influence on our reading of these two poets? It would surely be hypocritical to claim that we can simply set them to one side. T. S. Eliot's reactionary religious conservatism may be as offensive to some as Ezra Pound's aggressive support of Fascism, but to pretend that we can read the works of either of these two major poets without bearing them in mind would be naive in the extreme.


Ezra Pound: The Pisan Cantos (1949)



I'm not proposing any kind of simplistic "four legs good, two legs bad" labels for the poets I'll be talking about. If, as Aristotle claimed, man is a political animal, we need to maintain a complex and nuanced view of politics to incorporate this fact usefully into our aesthetic discussions. Certainly my own politics have shifted considerably over the years, as I've seen more of life, and learned more from others.

I see it as something not to shy away from but rather to embrace.


Francis Renaud: Saint-John Perse (1936)





Guadeloupe (Lesser Antilles)


Alexis Leger, who would later adopt the nom-de-plume Saint-John (or St.-John, or Saint John) Perse, was born in Pointe-à-Pitre, on the Caribbean island of Guadeloupe, in 1887.
The Leger family owned two plantations, one of coffee (La Joséphine) and the other of sugar (Bois-Debout). Leger described his childhood on Guadeloupe as being as French "as only the colonials are French". Later on, Leger embellished his family origins by changing his surname to the more aristocratic sounding St. Léger and by claiming that his ancestors were an ancienne noblesse family who had settled in Guadeloupe in the 17th century.
One gushing critic has claimed that:
Growing up surrounded by the luxurious fauna and flora of the West Indies, Alexis perhaps could not but develop an interest in nature ...
Whether that's true or not, the Leger family chose to return to metropolitan France in 1899, the so-called "'year of all dangers' ... a period of racial tension on Guadeloupe, with both blacks and whites committing arson in the belief that French rule would soon be ending."


Martinique (Lesser Antilles)


Aimé Césaire, the future French poet, essayist, and politician, was born in Basse-Pointe, Martinique, French Caribbean, in 1913. His father was a tax inspector, and his mother was a dressmaker.
Although ... he evoked his childhood as poverty-stricken and squalid, his family was part of the island's small, black middle class.
His family moved to the capital of Martinique, Fort-de-France, in order for Césaire to attend the only secondary school on the island, Lycée Victor Schœlcher. "He was not happy there, and found the town's racial and class bigotry to be upsetting."
Césaire traveled to Paris to attend the Lycée Louis-le-Grand on an educational scholarship. There, ... he passed the entrance exam for the École Normale Supérieure in 1935 and created the literary review L'Étudiant noir ... with Léopold Sédar Senghor and Léon Damas. Manifestos by these three students in its third number (May–June 1935) initiated the Négritude movement later substantial in both pan-Africanist theory and the actual decolonization of the French Empire in Africa.


It is, to say the least, an interesting coincidence that two such different poets, with such different career trajectories, should have been born so close together, on virtually adjacent islands.

The Caribbean certainly has a rich literary history. Jean Rhys was born on Dominica, Derek Walcott on St. Lucia, V. S. Naipaul on Trinidad, Edward Brathwaite on Barbados, to name just a few of the more prominent names. In each case, race is a crucial factor in the nature of their writing. How could it not be?




Zarah Sultana UK MP (19/8/26)


As I work on this post, the internet and the more traditional media are seething with unrest over the case of British Sociology Professor Jason Arday, who was - depending on which view you choose to take on the matter - either the hapless victim of a digital lynching, or a mendacious plagiarist, promoted beyond his abilities by a publicity-hungry university.



The facts remain controversial, but it seems to be the case that the allegations of plagiarism against Arday were first chronicled in a 63-page report by Times Higher Education Supplement reporter Jack Grove in 2025. The specific complaints about his PhD thesis were evaluated by a panel at Liverpool John Moores University, which awarded the degree. They concluded:
that the similarities between Arday's thesis and an earlier PhD thesis by another academic were the result of "honest and reasonable error", not deliberate plagiarism, and were "well within the accepted range of compliance with the academic standards of the time".

Nathan Cofnas (b.1985/6)


This is where self-styled "race realist" Nathan Cofnas enters the story. Cofnas was at the time a postdoctoral researcher at Ghent University in Belgium, having been previously dismissed from his position as a a research associate at Emmanuel College, Cambridge, over a 2024 blog post in which he claimed that in a meritocratic system, black people:
would disappear from almost all high-profile positions outside of sports and entertainment ... [and] Harvard faculty would be recruited from the best of the best students, which means the number of black professors would approach zero per cent.
Cofnas wrote in a July 2026 Substack post that he had run Arday's PhD thesis through plagiarism detection software and discovered that:
many passages are lifted with minimal editing, sometimes retaining copy-editing mistakes from the original source.
Despite the earlier findings of the Liverpool misconduct panel, the case was now relitigated extensively in the press and online. Hundreds of articles appeared scrutinising every detail of Arday's life and achievements. He was denounced as a "liar and fantasist", and his memoir Great and Unfortunate Things was described alternately as "mawkish, self-aggrandising and hard to believe" and "painfully, mind-numbingly dull". The Telegraph reviewer, however, conceded that
The final impression, perhaps, isn't chiefly that of a serial fabulist who filled a professorship he was unqualified for, but of a profoundly lonely and psychologically troubled man who is unable to quench his thirst for respect and recognition.
Perhaps the most telling point was made by Arday himself, quite early in the process:
He argued that if other academics' work was similarly scrutinised it would show similar errors, and that there was a racially motivated campaign to remove him from his Cambridge position:
I hold myself accountable and other people should hold me accountable. We're talking about academia here. I didn't murder somebody. I think the cruelty that I've experienced ... is totally unacceptable.


It's worth stressing here that all of this was trial by media. The only actual formal investigative process Arday ever faced exonerated him. Since his death by suicide, attention has been called to the numerous lists which have been compiled over the years of Academics who've been convicted of sexual harassment, plagiarism, and neglect of their duties, and have either kept their jobs or been allowed to resign quietly. None of them appear to have faced the same public witch hunt as Professor Arday.





St.-John Perse: Anabasis. Trans. T. S. Eliot (1930)


Alexis Leger first came to the attention of English-speaking readers when his book-length poem Anabase (1924) was published by Faber & Faber in a translation by T. S. Eliot. This is the only time Eliot did such a thing, and given that it's hard to exaggerate the sway he held over the world of poetry at the time, it certainly had quite an effect.

He said of Perse's poem in his introduction:
I believe that this is a piece of writing of the same importance as the later work of James Joyce, as valuable as Anna Livia Plurabelle.
High praise indeed, to be welcome into the same Modernist pantheon as Joyce by Eliot himself! The poem itself begins as follows:




St.-John Perse: Anabase (1924)

Anabasis: Song
Chanson Il naissait un poulain sous les feuilles de bronze. Un homme mit des baies amères dans nos mains. Etranger. Qui passait. Et voici qu’il est bruit d’autres provinces à mon gré... « Je vous salue, ma fille, sous le plus grand des arbres de l’année. » * Car le soleil entre au Lion et l’Etranger a mis son doigt dans la bouche des morts. Etranger. Qui riait. Et nous parle d’une herbe. Ah ! tant de souffles aux provinces ! Qu’il est d’aisance dans nos voies ! que la trompette m’est délice, et la plume savante au scandale de l’aile !... « Mon âme, grande fille, vous aviez vos façons qui ne sont pas les nôtres. » * Il naquit un poulain sous les feuilles de bronze. Un homme mit ces baies amères dans nos mains. Etranger. Qui passait. Et voici d’un grand bruit dans un arbre de bronze. Bitume et roses, don du chant ! Tonnerre et flûtes dans les chambres ! Ah ! tant d’aisance dans nos voies, Ah ! tant d’histoires à l’année, et l’Etranger à ses façons par les chemins de toute la terre !... « Je vous salue, ma fille, sous la plus belle robe de l’année. » - St.-John Perse (1924)
A foal was born under the bronze leaves a man put bitter bay leaves in our hands a stranger passing by now pleasing rumours from distant provinces greetings daughter under the grandest tree of the year * The sun enters Leo the stranger thrusts his hand in the mouths of the dead a stranger laughing telling us of a herb so many winds cross the provinces how easy our ways how the trumpets ring pens peddle scandal under its wing daughter of my soul your ways were not ours * A foal was born under bronze leaves a man pressed bitter bay leaves in our hands a stranger passing by now the bronze tree resounds tar and roses the gift of song thunder and flutes in the rooms so easy our ways so many stories told throughout the year the stranger traversing the ways of the earth greetings daughter in your brightest dress of the year

- trans. JR (1-10/9/2026)


T. S. Eliot: The Waste Land. Ed. Michael North (1922 / 2001)


There's undoubtedly a sort of heraldic magnificence to Perse's lines. It's not hard to see why they appealed so much to T. S. Eliot: all those references to the Zodiac; to the distant provinces of the empire (which empire? Alexander's, perhaps - or Caesar's: perhaps any or all of them); to herb-lore (is the herb the stranger asks about the sacred moly, perhaps - the herb that Odysseus is given by Hermes to defend him from Circe's magic? Is the stranger Hermes? Or Odysseus himself?).

All that is very much the stock-in-trade of The Waste Land. Perse's stranger might have been taken straight from that poem, in fact:
Who is the third who walks always beside you?
When I count, there are only you and I together
But when I look ahead up the white road
There is always another one walking beside you
Gliding wrapt in a brown mantle, hooded
I do not know whether a man or a woman
- But who is that on the other side of you?
Then there are all the seasonal references:
               tant d’histoires à l’année,
et l’Etranger à ses façons par les chemins de toute la terre
T. S. Eliot translates that into a kind of archaic argot as: "how many tales to the year, and by the roads of all the earth the Stranger to his ways". The "daughter" in Perse's poem, too, sounds uncomfortably as if she's preparing herself for the Rite of Spring:


Igor Stravinsky: Sacrificial Dance from the Rite of Spring (Paris, 1913)





Aimé Césaire: Cahier d'un retour au pays natal (1943 / 1973)


Aimé Césaire, too, owes much of his worldwide fame to a single long poem. The story goes that arch-surrealist André Breton was in a grocer's shop one day, and happened to see a copy of the first, crudely printed, 1939 version of Cahier d'un retour au pays natal [Notebook of a return to my native land] lying on the counter. He picked it up, and was immediately struck by its incandescent vigour. He ended up writing a preface to the 1943 reprint of the poem where he hailed the author as "Un grand poète noir" [a great black poet]:
Ce qui est fêté ici, c'est une des plus grandes réussites de la poésie de langue française de ce temps. [...] Le poème est une ascension vers la pleine conscience de la liberté.

What we are celebrating here is one of the greatest successes in contemporary French poetry ... The poem is an ascension to the full consciousness of freedom.



Aimé Césaire: Return to My Mative Land (1969)

from Return to My Mative Land
Cahier d'un retour au pays natal 1 Au bout du petit matin bourgeonnant d’anses frêles les Antilles qui ont faim, les Antilles grêlées de petite vérole, les Antilles dynamitées d’alcool, échouées dans la boue de cette baie, dans la poussière de cette ville sinistrement échouées. 2 Au bout du petit matin, l’extrême, trompeuse désolée eschare sur la blessure des eaux ; les martyrs qui ne témoignent pas ; les fleurs du sang qui se fanent et s’éparpillent dans le vent inutile comme des cris de perroquets babillards ; une vieille vie menteusement souriante, ses lèvres ouvertes d’angoisses désaffectées ; une vieille misère pourrissant sous le soleil, silencieusement ; un vieux silence crevant de pustules tièdes 3 l’affreuse inanité de notre raison d’être. 4 Au bout du petit matin, sur cette plus fragile épaisseur de terre que dépasse de façon humiliante son grandiose avenir – les volcans éclateront, l’eau nue emportera les taches mûres du soleil et il ne restera plus qu’un bouillonnement tiède picoré d’oiseaux marins – la plage des songes et l’insensé réveil. 5 Au bout du petit matin, cette ville plate – étalée, trébuchée de son bon sens, inerte, essouflée sous son fardeau géométrique de croix éternellement recommençante, indocile à son sort, muette, contrariée de toutes façons, incapable de croître selon le suc de cette terre, embarrassée, rognée, réduite, en rupture de faune et de flore. - Aimé Césaire (1939)
1 in the wee hours budding with frail coves the hungry Antilles Antilles pockmarked with smallpox Antilles dynamited by alcohol stranded in the mud of this bay in the dust of this city malevolently stranded 2 in the wee hours the extreme deceptive desolate scab on the wound of the waters the martyrs who can’t bear witness the flowers of blood that wither and scatter in the wind useless like the prating of parrots an old life lying through smiles its lips open with anxieties disaffected an old misery rotting under the sun in silence old silences bursting with tepid pustules 3 the dreadful inanity of our reasons for being alive 4 in the wee hours on this most fragile weight of earth whose grandiose future humiliatingly overtops the volcanoes will erupt the naked water will carry away the ripe spots of the sun and all that will remain is a tepid bubbling pecked by seabirds the beach of dreams and inchoate awakening 5 in the wee hours these city wastes sprawling stumbling over their own common sense inert breathless under their geometric weight of crosses eternally recurrent defiant of their fate mute relentlessly thwarted incapable of growth through the sap of this land hampered clipped diminished deprived of fauna and flora

- trans. JR (2-11/9/2026)



You can see why it made such an immediate impression. The opening of Aimé Césaire's poem may be full of echoes - of Rimbaud's Une Saison en Enfer; of the dark wood in Dante's Divine Comedy; even, perhaps, of Perse's Anabasis - but this visonary awakening in the hellscape of a modern Caribbean city struck an entirely new note in French writing.

Whether or not Perse's own poem, published in 1924, was directly influenced by Eliot's The Waste Land (1922) is debatable. But both poets were certainly responding to the same sense of post-war malaise, the threat of a crumbling civilisation waiting (as C. P. Cavafy had put it some twenty years earlier) for the Barbarians.

Again, whether either Perse or Eliot had read (or taken to heart) Yeats's prophetic poem "The Second Coming" (1920), it certainly expressed similar fears:
        somewhere in sands of the desert   
A shape with lion body and the head of a man,   
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,   
Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it   
Reel shadows of the indignant desert birds.   
Just as Eliot served as the Virgil who ushered Perse into the world's regard, so André Breton, the turbulent King of the Surrealists, performed the same office for Aimé Césaire. Whether the latter really welcomed this affiliation is doubtful. Certainly the extensive revisions he made for the later editions of his poem showed a desire on his part to move away from what could so easily be read as a surrealist dreamscape to an ever more politicised manifesto for change.

Here, for example, is the new opening stanza of the first official Parisian publication of his great poem:

Au bout du petit matin ... Va-t’en, lui disais-je, gueule de flic, gueule de vache, va-t’en je déteste les larbins de l’ordre et les hannetons de l’espérance. Va-t’en mauvais gris-gris, punaise de moinillon. Puis je me tournais vers des paradis pour lui et les siens perdus, plus calme que la face d’une femme qui ment, et là, bercé par les effluves d’une pensée jamais lasse je nourrissais le vent, je délaçais les montres et j’entendais monter de l’autre côté du désastre, un fleuve de tourterelles et de trèfles de la savane que je porte toujours dans mes profondeurs à hauteur inverse du vingtième étage des maisons les plus insolentes et par précaution contre la force putréfiante des ambiances crépusculaires, arpentée nuit et jour d’un sacré soleil vénérien. - Aimé Césaire (1947)
feck off I told him flat-foot arse-licker feck off I hate grovelling toadstools obsequious cockroaches feck off bad juju bedlice of a monk then turned to paradises lost for him and his loved ones calmer than the face of a lying woman and there lulled by the effluvia of a nagging maggot I fed the wind untied the monsters and heard rising from the other side of the disaster the river of doves and savannah pollen which I still hold in my inverse depths as high as the twentieth floor of the most insolent houses as a charm against the putrefying force of twilight air patrolled night and day by a dose from the cursed sun

- trans. JR (2-10/9/2026)


Aimé Césaire: Cahier d'un retour au pays natal (1947)


But whichever version you read - the 1939 offprint, the 1947 first edition, or the radically revised 1956 text - the sheer verbal energy and hallucinatory power of Césaire's vision of Martinique is undeniable. It's a disenchanted snapshot of the backside of modern colonialism, rather than an Eliotic lament for the downfall of some ancient courtly order.

The viewpoint of a descendant of slaves is unlikely to coincide with that of the scions of their owners.






Paul Gauguin: Martinique Landscape (1887)


To continue this theme, it's interesting to compare the nostalgic vision of a West Indian childhood eulogised in Alexis Leger's first book of poems, Éloges (1911), with the rather more embattled cultural pantheon portrayed in Aimé Césaire's elegy for the older poet, "Voodoo Ceremony for Saint John Perse" (1976).

Éloges begins with an out-and-out paean to the joys of colonialism:




Éloges (1911 / 1967)

Praises: Scrawled on the Door
Éloges: Écrit sur la porte J'ai une peau couleur de tabac rouge ou de mulet, j'ai un chapeau en moelle de sureau couvert de toile blanche. Mon orgueil est que ma fille soit très-belle quand elle commande aux femmes noires; ma joie, quelle découvre un bras très-blanc parmi ses poules noires ; et qu'elle n'ait point honte de ma joue rude sous le poil, quand je rentre boueux. ⁂ Et d'abord je lui donne mon fouet, ma gourde et mon chapeau. En souriant elle m'acquitte de ma face ruisselante; et porte à son visage mes mains grasses d'avoir éprouvé l'amande de kako, la graine de café. Et puis elle m'apporte un mouchoir de tête bruissant; et ma robe de laine; de l'eau pure pour rincer mes dents de silencieux : et l'eau de ma cuvette est là; et j'entends l'eau du bassin dans la case-à-eau. ⁂ Un homme est dur, sa fille est douce. Qu'elle se tienne toujours à son retour sur la plus haute marche de la maison blanche, et faisant grâce à son cheval de l'étreinte des genoux, il oubliera la fièvre qui tire toute la peau du visage en dedans. ⁂ J'aime encore mes chiens, l'appel de mon plus fin cheval, et voir au bout de l'allée droite mon chat sortir de la maison en compagnie de la guenon... toutes choses suffisantes pour n'envier pas les voiles des voiliers que j'aperçois à la hauteur du toit de tôle sur la mer comme un ciel. - St.-John Perse (1911)
My skin’s red as tobacco or a mule my dusty pith helmet’s white my daughter’s fair as she bosses around the black women I’m glad that she preens her white arms against the black hens and that she’s not ashamed to feel my rough cheeks under the stubble when I come home flecked in mud ⁂ first I give her my whip my flask and my hat she smiles in my sweaty face puts her face in my hands stained brown by cocoa and coffee beans then she wraps my head in a bandanna brings me my dressing gown water to rinse my teeth the water in the basin feels cool I can hear the waters below us in the cistern ⁂ a man is hard his daughter soft she comes out to welcome him on the top step of our blank house the horse is glad to be free of the grip of his knees he forgets the pain that tightens the skin of his face ⁂ I love my dogs the neigh of my horse seeing at the end of the straight path my cat step out of the house beside the monkey ... plenty of things here to stop me longing for the winged ships I can glimpse from the tip of the tin roof on that sea blue like the sky

- trans. JR (2-11/9/2026)


Robert Labor: Dessin en lisant St John Perse II (1977)


At least some of that must have been intended satirically. This vision of the colonial idyll was surely a bit out-of-date already in those halcyon, pre-war days ... But though it may have been meant partly tongue-in-cheek, there's still a bedrock of pure evocation under it.

After all, such celebratory passages abound in the poems included in this, his first collection, many of them linked to the not-so-pure joys of childhood:


Éloges (1911 / 1967)

from Celebrating Childhood
Pour fêter une enfance: II Et les servantes de ma mère, grandes filles luisantes ... Et nos paupières fabuleuses ... O clartés! ô faveurs! Appelant toute chose, je récitai qu'elle était grande, appelant toute bête, qu'elle était belle et bonne. O mes plus grandes fleurs voraces, parmi la feuille rouge, à dévorer tous mes plus beaux insectes verts! Les bouquets au jardin sentaient le cimetière de famille. Et une très petite soeur était morte: j'avais eu, qui sent bon, son cercueil d'acajou entre les glaces de trois chambres. Et il ne fallait pas tuer l'oiseau-mouche d'un caillou ... Mais la terre se courbait dans nos jeux comme fait la servante, celle qui a droit à une chaise si l'on se tient dans la maison. ... Végétales ferveurs, ô clartés ô faveurs ! ... Et puis ces mouches, cette sorte de mouches, vers le dernier étage du jardin, qui étaient comme si la lumière eut chanté! ... Je me souviens du sel, je me souviens du sel que la nourrice jaune dut essuyer à l'angle de mes yeux. Le sorcier noir sentenciait à l'office: «Le monde est comme une pirogue, qui, tournant et tournant, ne sait plus si le vent voulait rire ou pleurer ...» Et aussitôt mes yeux tâchaient à peindre un monde balancé entre des eaux brillantes, connaissaient le mât lisse des fûts, la hune sous les feuilles, et les guis et les vergues, les haubans de liane, où trop longues, les fleurs s’achevaient en des cris de perruches. - St.-John Perse (1911)
And my mother's maids tall lustrous girls our eyelids open wide O lights O gifts reaching for everything around me I testified that it was great naming each creature that it was beautiful and good chief among them the voracious flowers hidden in the red leaves devouring the most beautiful of my green insects but the bouquets in the garden smelled of the family graveyard a very little sister had died I felt her fragrant mahogany coffin poised between the mirrors of three rooms nor should you kill the hummingbird with a pebble the earth bent over our games as the maid does the one who’s allowed to sit down when you’re in the house green excess O lights O gifts and then those flies that kind of fly in the dizzy heights of the garden which felt as if the light had sung I remember the salt I remember that salt scurf the yellow nurse had to wipe from the corners of my eyes the black magician prophesied the world is like a canoe it spins around no longer knows if the wind wants to laugh or cry and at once my eyes could see a world poised between bright planes of water I felt the smooth heft of the barrels the crow's nest under the leaves the spars and yards the shrouds of vines where the flowers run out at last in the calls of the parakeets

- trans. JR (2-9/9/2026)




You can certainly understand, reading this, why Perse's work had such a great effect when it first appeared in print. The patterns of his free verse owed a lot of Rimbaud and the Symbolists, but his subject-matter was so fresh and new. Those other poets - Baudelaire, Mallarmé - had journeyed far in their imaginations, but Perse had actually been there. He had only to open the eyes of his French readers on the world he'd lived in as a child to astonish them with fresh visions of paradise.

The parts that stick out for us - those "luisantes" [lustrous] maids, the "nourrice jaune" [yellow nurse] who had the job of picking out his eye-gunge, the one special servant who had the right to sit down in the house - would hardly even have been noticeable then. This was still, after all, a feudal world - where every middle-class family had their own set of servants if they wanted to be considered respectable.

He might even be said to have put his best foot forward in this early work of his. Much still lay in the future - the dazzling diplomatic career in the world's capitals; the resolute stance against fascism and the Vichy regime; eventually, the Nobel Prize - but for pure lyric exuberance it's hard to get past these early poems, obscurely troubling though they may now sound.

This sense of being in two minds about him and his work is perhaps best expressed in the rather equivocal elegy composed by his fellow Antillean Aimé Césaire:




Andre Normil: Vodou Ceremony (2010)

Voodoo Ceremony for St.-John Perse
Cérémonie Vaudou pour Saint-John Perse ... celui qui balise l’aire d’atterissage des colibris celui qui plante en terre une hampe d’asclépias de Curaçao pour fournir le gîte aux plus grands monarques du monde qui sont en noblesse d’exil et papillons de pasage celui pour qui les burseras de la sierra suant sang et eau et plus de sang que d’eau et pelés n’en finissent pas de se tordre les bras grotesques dans leur parade de damnés celui qui contemple chaque jour la première leerte génétique qu’il est superflu de nommer jusqu’à parfait rougeoiement avec à recueillir le surplus de forces hors du vide historique le chercheur de sources perdues le demèleur de laves cordées celui qui calcule l’étiage de la colère dans les terres de labour et de mainbour celui quid u sang reencontré la roue du temps et du contretemps mille fois plus gémissante que norias sur l’Oronte celui qui remplace l’asphodèle des prairies infernales par – sacrale - la belle coiffure afro de l’haemanthus -Angela Davies de ces lieux- riche de toutes les épingles de nos sangs hérissés (le vit-il le vit-il l’Etranger Plus rouge pourtant que le sang de Tammouz et nos faces décebales le vit-il le vit-il l’Etranger?) phlégréennes oiseaux profonds tourterelles de l’ombre et du grief et que l’arc s’embrase et que l’un à l’autre océan les magmas fastueux en volcans se répondent pour de toutes gueules de tous fumants sabords honorer en route pour le grand large l’ultime Conquistador en son dernier voyage - Aimé Césaire (1976)
he who marks out the hummingbird landing strip who plants a stalk of Curaçao milkweed in the earth guarding the world's most gaudy monarchs nobility in exile errant butterflies he for whom the aromatic tree resin of the Sierra sweating blood and water more blood than water never ceases to writhe its grotesque stump in a blind parade of the damned he who meditates day by day on that first genetic letter superfluous to name till history stains it red with the excess force excreted by the void the seeker of lost springs the disentangler of ropy lava he who reckons the low point of rage in the ploughed lands and measures the wheel of time and anti-time in domains a thousand times more harsh than the man-trodden waterwheels of the Orontes he who replaces the asphodel of the infernal meadows with the sacred consecrated Afro of the haemanthus Angela Davis of the underworld rich with the pricks of our inflected blood did he see it did he see the Stranger redder than Tammuz’ blood and our Dacian decebalic faces did he see it did he see the Stranger? Phlegraean lava fields knee-deep in birds doves of shadow and grief that the bow ignites and from one sea to the other the mater magma in volcanoes answers to honour each mouth each smoking pothole on the way to the open ocean the ultimate Conquistador on his last voyage

- trans. JR (2-10/9/2026)




Bibliothèque de la Pléiade: Oeuvres complètes de Saint-John Perse (1972)


Two marvellous poets, two impressive careers. The first of them ended in a Nobel Prize and a specially designed Pléiade volume designed to preserve the poet's own choice of texts, letters, and accompanying materials: a truly authorised edition of his works to be enshrined among the other leading lights of French literature.



The other one also ended with an impressive-looking hardback in the CNRS [Centre national de la recherche scientifique] series, edited by an American scholar a few years after the author's death. It was a wonderful memorial, certainly, but not precisely the Bibliothèque de la Pléiade.

There were some rumours back in 2007 regarding a Pléiade volume (or volumes) devoted to the founders of Négritude (Aimé Césaire, Léopold Sédar Senghor, and Léon-Gontran Damas), but they don't appear to have come to anything. If you search for black authors in the Pléiade, the only one you'll be directed to - at present - is Alexandre Dumas (1802-1870).

It's not that any of this is exactly surprising. The new Aimé Césaire edition is very fine, and has already revolutionised the study of his texts. Nor is the Nobel Prize of nearly as much significance in the eyes of posterity as those who award it presumably imagine it to be: the list of the writers who didn't get it (Chekhov, Conrad, Ibsen, Proust, Tolstoy) is rather more impressive than the list of those who did.

It's just that it's hard to deny that the rewards came more easily to Alexis Leger than they did to his younger compatriot. He was, after all, "one of us" (in Conrad's phrase) - a member of the club, in a way that none of his black contemporaries could ever hope to be.

Like Jason Arday, Aimé Césaire never expected a free pass, or even the benefit of the doubt. Both of these poets may have struggled, but Césaire was held back, continues to be held back, by the colour of his skin. It's hard to accept that that's still the case, but the Arday case has revealed some uncomfortable truths in that respect.

Putting them side by side like this, as I've done in this post, is all very well, but in life it's unlikely they ever moved in the same circles. So if you're tempted to write off any of Césaire's poetry as surrealist automatic writing, take a closer look - and see if you can see through the camouflage his meanings often hide behind:




The Himalayas

When Naked Monks Climb Down the Himalayas in the Heat
A L'heure ou dans la Chaleur les Moines Nus Descendent de L'himalaya Très fort pendant les moustiques montés des volutes chargées à mitraille des maremmes joli cœur de la brutalité à la patte moricaude des bouges de sangliers Très fort pendant les grands fleuves qui à la vermine débranchent leurs cuisses très immondes lèvres bleues giclant un rire cru de vagin Très fort pendant la face molle des pollens s'écrasant dans la conspiration du vent et les cheminées qui fument sous le tunnel des épaules des fauves en escarboucles d'yeux plus tendres que leur alentour de graminées Très fort monstre contre monstre le tien dont le corps est une statue de suc de bois rouge dont le crachat est un pissat de fofa le mien dont la sueur est un jet de bile de caïman que je les sorte enfin comme une nuit pluvieuse de cris d'alouates de ma poitrine si tendre de fausse oronge - Aimé Césaire (1946)
very strong mosquitoes rising from the swirls loaded with shrapnel from the marsh smart heart of brutality in the swarthy paw of the wild boars' den very strong great rivers disconnect their soiled thighs from vermin blue lips disgorge a raw laugh of vagina very strong the soft mask of pollen crushing conspiracies of the wind the smoking chimneys under the tunnel of the wild beasts’ shoulders carbuncled eyes sweeter than the surrounding grass very strong monster against monster yours whose body is a statue of redwood sap whose spittle is a spurt of piss mine whose sweat is a jet of caiman bile till I whip them out at last like a rainy night of lark’s cries from my breast so soft in their mock orange

- trans. JR (2-10/9/2026)


The Collected Poetry of Aimé Césaire. Trans. Clayton Eshleman & Annette J. Smith (1984)





Aimé Césaire: Self-portrait (2008)

Aimé Fernand David Césaire
(1913-2008)

Books I own are marked in bold:
    Poetry:

  1. Cahier d'un retour au pays natal (1939)
    • Cahier d’un retour au pays natal / Return to My Native Land. Préface de André Breton. 1943. Paris: Présence Africaine, 1973.
    • Return to My Native Land. 1956. Trans. John Berger & Anna Bostock. Introduction by Mazisi Kunene. Penguin Poets. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1969.
  2. Les armes miraculeuses (1946)
  3. Soleil cou-coupé (1948)
  4. Corps perdu (1950)
  5. Ferrements (1960)
  6. Cadastre (1961)
  7. Moi, laminaire (1982)
  8. Comme un malentendu de salut ... (1994)

  9. Theatre:

  10. ... Et les chiens se taisaient (1943)
  11. La Tragédie du roi Christophe (1963)
    • The Tragedy of King Christophe (1969)
  12. Une saison au Congo (1966)
    • A Season in the Congo (1968)
  13. Une Tempête: adaptation pour un théâtre nègre (1969)
    • A Tempest (1986)

  14. Prose:

  15. "Poésie et connaissance", Tropiques 12 (1945): 158–70.
  16. Discours sur le colonialisme (1955)
      Discourse on Colonialism. Trans. Joan Pinkham. Introduction by Robin Kelley. Rev. ed. (2003)
  17. Lettre à Maurice Thorez (1956)
  18. Toussaint Louverture: La Révolution française et le problème colonial (1960)

  19. Works:

  20. The Collected Poetry. Trans. Clayton Eshleman & Annette Smith. Prints by Wilfredo Lam (1983)
  21. Poésie, Théâtre, Essais et Discours : édition critique. Ed. Albert James Arnold. CNRS Editions (2014)
  22. The Complete Poetry of Aimé Césaire: Bilingual Edition (2017)
    • The Complete Poetry of Aimé Césaire: Bilingual Edition. Trans. A. James Arnold & Clayton Eshleman. 2017. Middletown, Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press, 2024.






nobelprize.org: Saint-John Perse (1960)

Alexis Leger
[Saint-John Perse]

(1887-1975)

    Poetry:

  1. Éloges (1911)
    • Trans. Eugène Jolas (1928)
    • Included in: Collected Poems. Trans. Louise Varèse (1944, rev. 1956)
    • Trans. Eleanor Clark & Roger Little (1965)
    • Trans. King Bosley (1970)
  2. Poème pour Valery Larbaud (1922)
    • Included in: Collected Poems. Trans. Richard Howard (1969)
  3. Anabase (1924)
    • Anabasis: A Poem. Trans. T. S. Eliot. 1931. Rev. ed. 1959. Faber Paperback. London: Faber, 1985.
    • Included in: Collected Poems. Trans. T. S. Eliot (1931, rev. 1959)
    • Trans. Roger Little (1970)
  4. Exil (1942)
    • Included in: Collected Poems. Trans. Denis Devlin (1949)
  5. Pluies (1943)
    • Included in: Collected Poems. Trans. Denis Devlin (1944)
  6. Poème à l'étrangère (1943)
    • Included in: Collected Poems. Trans. Denis Devlin (1946)
  7. Neiges (1944)
    • Included in: Collected Poems. Trans. Denis Devlin (1945)
    • Trans. Walter J. Strachan (1947)
  8. Vents (1946)
    • Included in: Collected Poems. Trans. Hugh Chisholm (1953)
  9. Amers [Seamarks] (1957)
    • Included in: Collected Poems. Trans. Wallace Fowlie (1958)
    • Trans. Samuel E. Morison (1964)
  10. Chronique (1960)
    • Included in: Collected Poems. Trans. Robert Fitzgerald (1961)
  11. Poésie (1961)
    • Included in: Collected Poems. Trans. W. H. Auden (1961)
  12. Oiseaux (1963)
    • Trans. Wallace Fowlie (1963)
    • Included in: Collected Poems. Trans. Robert Fitzgerald (1966)
    • Trans. Roger Little (1967)
    • Trans. Derek Mahon (2002)
  13. Pour Dante (1965)
    • Included in: Collected Poems. Trans. Robert Fitzgerald (1966)
  14. Chant pour un équinoxe [Four Poems] (1968-74))
    1. Sécheresse (1974))
    2. Chant pour un équinoxe (1971)
    3. Nocturne (1972))
    4. Chanté par celle qui fut là (1968)
    • Included in: Collected Poems. Trans. Richard Howard (1977)
  15. Collected Poems. Bollingen Series (1971)
    • Collected Poems: Complete Edition. Trans. W. H. Auden, Hugh Chisholm, Denis Devlin, T. S. Eliot, Robert Fitzgerald, Wallace Fowlie, Richard Howard & Louise Varèse. 1971. Rev. ed. 1983. Bollingen Series LXXXVII. Princeton Legacy Library. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2016.

  16. Works:

  17. Œuvres complètes (1972), Bibliothèque de la Pléiade (1972)
    • Oeuvres complètes. 1972. Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, 240. 1982. Paris: Gallimard, 2004.

  18. Letters:

  19. St.-John Perse: Letters. Bollingen Series (1979)
    • St.-John Perse: Letters. 1972. Trans. & ed. Arthur J. Knodel. Bollingen Series LXXXVII: 2. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979.


Saint John Perse: Collected Poems: Bilingual Edition (1971)





Monday, September 08, 2025

The Ghost in Hamlet


William Blake: Hamlet and his Father's Ghost (1806)


I remember that when we marked exams in the Auckland University English Department, we tutors were always instructed not to leave any comments - especially nasty ones - on the papers. Instead, we circulated a few stapled sheets for any thoughts we had beyond the bare grade.

The reason for this (I was told) was because there'd been a big fuss a few years before when a student made a formal request to see their script and found it covered with sarcastic marginalia.

Human nature being what it is, these comment-bundles tended to become the academic equivalent of a gag reel. They were carefully collected and burned at the end of each examination season.

Among the quotable quotes one of my colleagues recorded from our Stage 1 Shakespeare exam one year was the following remark about Hamlet: "The question is: is it a Protestant ghost or a Catholic ghost?"

He apparently thought it very risible to have to ascertain the spectre's doctrinal preferences before you decided whether or not you should pay any attention to its advice. It did sound rather funny - as stated - but I suspected at once that this phrase must have come from one of my tutorial students. It was I who had been stressing the differing views on the afterlife held by various Christian sects.



Put simply, is Hamlet's deceased father now located in Purgatory, or in Hell? If the former, his intentions must presumably be good; if the latter, the question is far more equivocal.

When the ghost speaks of the "sulf’rous and tormenting flames" to which he is condemned by day, that sounds very much like hellfire.

However, the rest of his statement would imply otherwise:
I am thy father’s spirit,
Doomed for a certain term to walk the night
And for the day confined to fast in fires
Till the foul crimes done in my days of nature
Are burnt and purged away.

Ludovico Carracci: Purgatory (1610)


It's hard to read that line about his "foul crimes" being "burnt and purged away" as anything other than a reference to Purgatory. That is, after all, the place where such cleansing occurs. And Purgatory:
is a belief in Catholic theology. It is a passing intermediate state after physical death for purifying or purging a soul. A common analogy is dross being removed from gold in a furnace.
But how old is this doctrine? The idea of praying for the dead appears to have been part of Judeo-Christian practice for a very long time indeed. However:
At the Second Council of Lyon in 1274, when the Catholic Church defined, for the first time, its teaching on purgatory, the Eastern Orthodox Church did not adopt the doctrine. The council made no mention of purgatory as a third place or as containing fire ...
Subsequent papal pronouncements have clarified that "the term does not indicate a place, but a condition of existence."

As for the various Protestant churches, opinions vary according to denomination:
The Church of England, mother church of the Anglican Communion, officially denounces what it calls "the Romish Doctrine concerning Purgatory", but the Eastern Orthodox Church, Oriental Orthodox Churches, and elements of the Anglican, Lutheran, and Methodist traditions hold that for some there is cleansing after death and pray for the dead, knowing it to be efficacious. The Reformed Churches teach that the departed are delivered from their sins through the process of glorification.
In other words, you pays your money and you makes your choice.



Returning to Hamlet, though: despite its generally gloomy demeanour, the prince seems convinced by the end of this first encounter that it is "an honest ghost." That was not his initial reaction, though:
Angels and ministers of grace, defend us!
Be thou a spirit of health or goblin damned,
Bring with thee airs from heaven or blasts from hell,
Be thy intents wicked or charitable,
Thou com’st in such a questionable shape
That I will speak to thee.
There is indeed something very "questionable" about this apparition. It certainly claims to come from Purgatory, but ought we to believe it?



It's thought that Hamlet was written sometime between 1599 and 1601, in the latter years of Queen Elizabeth's reign. It was first published in 1603. The date of composition can be ascertained (to some extent) by some references in the text to the newly-formed company of boy players at Blackfriars theatre, as well as verbal echoes of some of Shakespeare's earlier plays.

This was definitely a time of great political uncertainty. Shakespeare himself only narrowly avoided trouble when his acting company put on a special performance of the play Richard II - which depicts the deposition of a monarch - for the supporters of the Earl of Essex, who mounted an abortive coup against the Queen in early 1601.

It seems a little unlikely, then, that Shakespeare would have been actively promulgating the "Romish Doctrine concerning Purgatory" in such troublous times, even if he was (as some suspect) a secret Catholic.


Saxo Grammaticus: Gesta Danorum (1514)


Denmark has, of course, been staunchly Protestant since the 1520s, when the Reformation first reached Scandinavia. But that doesn't really help us either way, since Shakespeare's knowledge of the country was probably hazy, and since the actual "events" on which the play is based (as reported in the 13th-century "Life of Amleth" by Saxo Grammaticus in his Gesta Danorum, at any rate) took place in the legendary past of the country.

So we're left with that question: Was this ghost more likely to be regarded as a "spirit of health" or as a "goblin damned" by contemporary playgoers?

The question was definitively resolved - in his own judgement, at any rate - by Professor Ken Larsen of Auckland University. Or so he informed us in the first year tutorials I attended as a callow undergraduate.

Larsen told us that he'd read a book on thaumaturgy from the 1590s which gave a series of clear indications whether or not you could trust a spirit to tell you the truth or not (I'm sorry to say that I don't recall its title).

I was argumentative even in those days, and suggested that even if that was so, it didn't necessarily follow that Shakespeare himself was of the same opinion as the author of the self-help guide to necromancy Larsen was citing as evidence.

"What do you mean?" he said.

"I mean that nowadays lots of people write lots of books about spirits and the supernatural, but just because they're contemporary with us doesn't mean that we agree with them, or that we're even aware of their conclusions. Even in a smaller cultural circle, 1590s London, there could be room for a number of views on the subject."

"What do you mean?" he repeated.

"I mean even though this book gives one clear opinion, Shakespeare may have been unaware of it, or even actively disagreed with it."

"I don't know what you're saying. Are you saying that it's a waste of time to try to gauge contemporary opinion on the subject?"

"No, not at all. I'm just saying that this book can be cited as valuable evidence, but it doesn't necessarily prove that that was what Shakespeare had in mind."

"I don't see what else I can do except what I'm doing. I've told you what the book said. You seem to be disputing that. I don't see what else I can say to make it clearer."

It was all rather frightening. The other students were glaring at me. My point seemed to me so obvious that it was hard to believe he couldn't understand it. Naturally he didn't expect any mere freshman to dispute his learned views - "What, I say? My foot my tutor?", as Prospero puts it when Miranda dares to question him similarly in The Tempest. But it was more than that. He didn't seem willing to concede the simple axiom that evidence (however interesting and relevant) isn't ipso facto conclusive proof.

I got a B+ from him on my essay - the only mark below the A's I received in my whole undergraduate career, I think.

But, as you can tell from my - no doubt somewhat biassed - account of our conversation, I still agree with myself. Larsen was a devotee of theological hairsplitting. He was always pointing out arcane doctrinal points in sixteenth and seventeenth century texts (as I discovered a few years later when I benefitted from his instruction on Spenser and other esoterically inclined poets). But he did seem, nevertheless, to lack what Keats called "negative capability": the ability to remain in doubt on a variety of thorny issues.


Jack Thorne: The Motive and the Cue (2023)


Recently, watching a cinematically projected version of Jack Thorne's stage-play The Motive and the Cue, which records:
the history behind the 1964 Broadway modern-dress production of William Shakespeare's Hamlet starring Richard Burton in a production directed by Sir John Gielgud.
I came across yet another interpretation of Hamlet's father's ghost. Could it be, as Gielgud suggests to his turbulent star, that Hamlet simply didn't like his father? That the real reason for his apparent dilatoriness and indecision throughout the play is because he'd been bullied and belittled by him all his life, and is therefore reluctant - however subliminally - to continue this state of subordination even after the old man's death?

This is, admittedly, meant more as a guide to Burton's brilliantly moody (by all accounts) performance as the melancholy Dane than as a serious theory about the play. But even taken out of context it does help to explain the Oedipal struggle so many have sensed at the root of the drama.


John Gilbert: The Ghost, Gertrude & Hamlet (1867)


The ghost does, after all, reappear. In Act 3, scene 4, just when Hamlet seems to be making progress in explaining and even justifying his odd behaviour to his mother, Queen Gertrude, the ghost suddenly walks in and starts to chide his son for tardiness in exacting revenge:
Do not forget. This visitation
Is but to whet thy almost blunted purpose.
But look, amazement on thy mother sits.
O, step between her and her fighting soul.
Conceit in weakest bodies strongest works.
Speak to her, Hamlet.
This is, at that particular moment, distinctly unhelpful advice. Gertrude can neither hear nor see the spirit, and her son's reaction to it persuades her - once and for all - that he's as crazy as a bedbug: "Alas, he’s mad."

So, once again, is this simply an act of tactlessness on the part of the impatient ghost - or is it deliberate sabotage? Is he a malign spirit, stirring up trouble for purposes of personal vengeance - or is he a genuine messenger from beyond, sent to purge all that's "rotten" in the state of Denmark.

Does he come from Purgatory, as a blessed (albeit somewhat erring) spirit - or from Hell, as a damned soul? To a strict Protestant, only the second alternative is really theologically possible. A Catholic could more easily entertain the first theory, though further proof would be necessary to confirm it.

An Anglo-Catholic, in the 1590s, could well be in doubt on such a matter. It's important to stress that Anglicanism is not, strictly speaking, a Protestant denomination. It's always existed in a complex and uneasy negotiation between the two extremes of the Reformation and the Counter-Reformation. That's still the case now, and it was certainly the case then.

Hamlet is not generally listed among the Shakespearean Problem Plays. As conceived by critic F. S. Boas in 1896, these are:
All's Well That Ends Well, Measure for Measure, and Troilus and Cressida. Some critics include other plays that were not enumerated by Boas, most commonly The Winter's Tale, Timon of Athens, and The Merchant of Venice.
However, Boas did adds that Hamlet links Shakespeare's problem-plays to his unambiguous tragedies.

The term itself (borrowed from Ibsen) was meant to denote plays "uneasily situated between the comic and the tragic." That's not really the case with Hamlet, which has all the hallmarks of Shakespearean tragedy (a fatally flawed hero, a tragic dilemma, and the curtain coming down on a stage full of corpses). But the play is profoundly problematic, all the same.


Laurence Olivier, dir.: Hamlet (1948)


The other great tragedies all exemplify a clear flaw in their protagonists: jealousy in Othello; ambition in Macbeth; pride in King Lear. But what's the moral deficiency in Hamlet? Laurence Olivier's film referred to it as "the tragedy of a man who could not make up his mind."


T. S. Eliot: The Sacred Wood (1920)


T. S. Eliot's notorious 1919 essay "Hamlet and His Problems" called the play an "artistic failure" because the character's emotion does not accord with the external machinery of the play. It fails (he claims) to find an adequate "objective correlative" — a set of external objects or situations which could evoke that specific emotion in the audience.


C. S. Lewis: Hamlet: the Prince or the Poem? (1942)


C. S. Lewis, in his riposte "Hamlet: the Prince or the Poem?" creates an amusing thought experiment to explain his own reactions to the play:
Let us suppose that a picture which you have not seen is being talked about. The first thing you gather from the vast majority of the speakers ... is that this picture is undoubtedly a very great work. The next thing you discover is that hardly any two people in the room agree as to what it is a picture of. Most of them find something curious about the pose, and perhaps even the anatomy, of the central figure. One explains it by saying that it is a picture of the raising of Lazarus, and that the painter has cleverly managed to represent the uncertain gait of a body just recovering from the stiffness of death. Another, taking the central figure to be Bacchus returning from the conquest of India, says that it reels because it is drunk. A third, to whom it is self-evident that he has seen a picture of the death of Nelson, asks with some temper whether you expect a man to look quite normal just after he has been mortally wounded. A fourth maintains that such crudely representational canons of criticism will never penetrate so profound a work, and that the peculiarities of the central figure really reflect the content of the painter’s subconsciousness. Hardly have you had time to digest these opinions when you run into another group of critics who denounce as a pseudo-problem what the first group has been discussing. According to this second group there is nothing odd about the central figure. A more natural and self-explanatory pose they never saw and they cannot imagine what all the pother is about. At long last you discover — isolated in a corner of the room, somewhat frowned upon by the rest of the company, and including few reputable connoisseurs in its ranks — a little knot of men who are whispering that the picture is a villainous daub and that the mystery of the central figure merely results from the fact that it is out of drawing.
It's not unreasonable to suppose, Lewis goes on, that "our first reaction would be to accept, at least provisionally," the last of these views. However:
‘Most certainly,’ says Mr. Eliot, ‘an artistic failure.’ But is it ‘most certain’? Let me return for a moment to my analogy of the picture. In that dream there was one experiment we did not make. We didn’t walk into the next room and look at it for ourselves. Supposing we had done so. Suppose that at the first glance all the cogent arguments of the unfavourable critics had died on our lips, or echoed in our ears as idle babble. Suppose that looking on the picture we had found ourselves caught up into an unforgettable intensity of life and had come back from the room where it hung haunted for ever with the sense of vast dignities and strange sorrows and teased ‘with thoughts beyond the reaches of our souls’ — would not this have reversed our judgement and compelled us, in the teeth of a priori probability, to maintain that on one point at least the orthodox critics were in the right? ‘Most certainly an artistic failure.’ All argument is for that conclusion — until you read or see Hamlet again. And when you do, you are left saying that if this is failure, then failure is better than success. We want more of these ‘bad’ plays. From our first childish reading of the ghost scenes down to those golden minutes which we stole from marking examination papers on Hamlet to read a few pages of Hamlet itself, have we ever known the day or the hour when its enchantment failed? That castle is part of our own world. The affection we feel for the Prince, and, through him, for Horatio, is like a friendship in real life ... When we want that taste, no other book will do instead. It may turn out in the end that the thing is not a complete success. This compelling quality in it may coexist with some radical defect. But I doubt if we shall ever be able to say ... that it is ‘most certainly’ a failure. Even if the proposition that it has failed were at last admitted for true, I can think of few critical truths which most of us would utter with less certainty, and with a more divided mind.
Lewis is, I hope you'll agree, quite right. Hamlet is a magnificent play - almost the magnificent play. It's the mountain peak all others aspire to. "If this is failure, then failure is better than success," as he so eloquently puts it.

I don't have a solution to the problem of the ghost in Hamlet. But I don't think that this is because I haven't looked hard enough - or am just too dumb to find it. I'm fairly sure that the point of the ghost in Hamlet is that we're being forced to remain in doubt about it.

It seems that the murder the ghost is so anxious Hamlet should revenge did indeed take place as described: Hamlet's uncle's actions at various points in the drama reveal as much. It also seems that the posthumous fate it describes for itself: "Doomed for a certain term to walk the night / And for the day confined to fast in fires" does indeed closely resemble the contemporary understanding of Purgatory. So it may well have been intended to be regarded by Shakespeare's immediate audience as "a spirit of health" rather than as "a goblin damned."


William Salter Herrick: Hamlet in the Queen’s Chamber (1857)


But it's impossible to be sure. Its second appearance is so unhelpful that it inevitably gives rise to doubts. Which leads us to go back and think again. Doesn't it make sense for Hamlet to question its bona fides, given the stark doctrine of pagan revenge this ghost is preaching?

It would indeed be nice if we could solve just this one little vexed point in the play, as Ken Larsen thought he had done. But to claim that is to miss the point. The reason Hamlet remains alive for us is because it defies easy analysis. It may be a "failure" if you measure it against the inexorable certainties of Oedipus Rex - but not if you see it as the root of all things modern in literature: uneasy, equivocal characters; unresolvable dilemmas; action as the root of harm as well as good.

The problems with Hamlet, then, are like so many of the other problems that beset us. As Dr. Johnson said, when asked to resolve the question of the existence of ghosts: "all argument is against it; but all belief is for it". There's definitely a ghost in Hamlet, and we're told that it's a role Shakespeare liked to reserve for himself, but who or what that ghost is, and whether or not it's seeking relief from damnation or purgation is beyond final construing. Perhaps that's the real significance of Hamlet's famous remark:
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.



King James I: Dæmonologie (1597)