Sunday, August 16, 2026

Ungaretti / Saba


Keats & Chapman (Belfast)


The year was 2004. I was about to start off on a car-trip around Ireland with my elder brother Ken. The problem was we didn't have enough books with us to read along the way. So when we stopped at a secondhand bookshop in Belfast, I was determined to find something large and intense enough to occupy a good deal of time.

I'd already reread War and Peace and Tim Powers' The Anubis Gates on an earlier leg of the trip, in Prague, so I was looking for something equally weighty. But nothing in the shop was calling out to me. Finally, I decided on a bit of uplift, and went up to the desk with the following two hefty tomes:


Umberto Saba: Tutte le poesie (2001)
Umberto Saba. Tutte le Poesie. Ed. Arrigo Stara. Introduction by Mario Lavagetto. I Meridiani. 1988. Milano: Arnoldo Mondadori Editore, 2001.

Stendhal: Voyages en Italie (1993)
Stendhal. Voyages en Italie. Ed. V. Del Litto. Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, 249. Paris: Gallimard, 1973.
The bookseller wouldn't sell them to me. "Not until I'm convinced that you can actually read them," he said.

"But I really can," I protested shrilly. "I can speak French quite well, and I studied Italian at university."

"So you're genuinely intending to read them? Not just put them on the shelf and look at them?"

"He really can read them," my brother added encouragingly.

"Prove it," the shopkeeper continued.

So I picked up the Stendhal, and started to translate a few lines. Then repeated the experience with the Saba. At the end of all that, I felt I'd really earned those books. It does seem a curious way to conduct your business, though.

Despite my embarrassment at the time, I suppose even then I respected his zeal for the proper use of the books he was selling. It was as if he felt a deep responsibility for their future good fortune - and for their being properly read rather than treated as fetish objects.


Olof Johan Södermark: Marie-Henri Beyle [Stendhal] (1783–1842)


And, you know, he had a point. They were too heavy and demanding for the road. We ended up buying some much lighter fiction a few stops further along. I've never got very far with Stendhal's Travels in Italy. Even his fiction can be a bit laborious at times.

As for Umberto Saba ... the problem was that I really knew nothing about him. Montale, Quasimodo, yes - even Cesare Pavese and Giuseppe Ungaretti, the other two Italians included in the Penguin Modern European Poets series. But Saba ... it was hard to get started without some kind of background to work from.

It's been twenty years, and it's only now that I'm really beginning my journey into his work. I have to say that I like very much what I've found so far.

I can only hope that I'm fulfilling - somewhat belatedly - that bookshop owner's hopes. And, if he's still in business - keep up the good work! Keep guilting your customers into thinking about what they're signing up for by buying each individual book.



Ulisse Nella mia giovinezza ho navigato lungo le coste dalmate. Isolotti a fior d'onda emergevano, ove raro un uccello sostava intento a prede, coperti d'alghe, scivolosi, al sole belli come smeraldi. Quando l'alta marea e la notte li annullava, vele sottovento sbandavano più al largo, per fuggirne l'insidia. Oggi il mio regno è quella terra di nessuno. Il porto accende ad altri i suoi lumi; me al largo sospinge ancora il non domato spirito, e della vita il doloroso amore. - Umberto Saba (1946)
When I was young I sailed down the Dalmatian coast rock-reefs stood out above the waves slick with algae emerald-green an occasional raptor hovering there intent on prey but when high tide and darkness swallowed them my leeward sails would steer us out to the open sea away from danger today my kingdom is that no-man’s land the harbour lights its lamps for others my love of life painful at times my perverse soul chase me out from every shelter

- trans. JR (2026)


Umberto Saba: Mediterranee (1946)


This poem, "Ulysses", comes from Saba's postwar volume Mediterranee [Mediterranean]. While largely self-explanatory, it does probably benefit from a bit of context.

For a start, Saba remains strongly identified with the northern port city of Trieste, a debatable land between Italy and the Balkan states for much of its modern history. Though now firmly part of Italy, it's always had the atmosphere of a cosmopolitan, international space between Western and Eastern Europe. James Joyce lived there on and off between 1904 and 1915, and it has a strong artistic and literary tradition.

When I studied Italian at Auckland University many years ago, our lecturer, Meme Churton, came from Trieste, while our conversation teacher, Francesca, hailed from Naples, which had the effect of giving us an on-the-spot grounding in the radically different cultures making up the patchwork quilt which is modern Italy.


Wikipedia: Gulf of Trieste


So it's natural enough that Saba's early memories should include sailing expeditions along what was then the Dalmatian coast, and is now the coast of Croatia.

But of course that's not really the point of the poem. And here it's probably beneficial to know a little more about Saba's own background. Umberto Poli, who would later adopt the pen-name "Saba", was born in 1883 to a Jewish mother and a Jewish-convert father in the Austro-Hungarian city of Trieste. He started to write poetry in 1900, and published his first book in 1911.

In 1919 he bought a second-hand bookshop, and thereafter supported himself and his family as an antiquarian bookseller. He continued to publish poetry along with some short prose pieces throughout the 1920s and 1930s, though the promulgation of the anti-Jewish laws of 1939 made his life increasingly difficult. He refused to convert to Catholicism, and was forced to go into hiding after the 1943 armistice and the German occupation of Northern Italy.

There's presumably something of all this, too, in the poem "Ulysses". The safe harbour of conformity is not for him - he, unfortunately, has been forced by circumstances as well as choice to occupy that "No-man's-land" of the open sea.

The poem is a subtle blend of autobiography and allegory - typical of so much Italian poetry just after the war, when the need to self-censor had largely gone, but the legacy of those decades of Fascism still weighed heavy. Saba even wrote for Benito Mussolini's Il Popolo d'Italia newspaper during the First World War - though certainly not afterwards. Like his younger contemporary Ungaretti, he was drafted into the army in 1915, but unlike Ungaretti, Saba "saw no active service and was hospitalised due to depression."

La capra Ho parlato a una capra Era sola sul prato, era legata. Sazia d'erba, bagnata alla pioggia, belava. Quell'uguale belato era fraterno al mio dolore. Ed io risposi, prima per celia, poi perchè il dolore è eterno, ha una voce e non varia. Questa voce sentiva gemere in una capra solitaria. In una capra dal viso semita sentiva querelarsi ogni altro male, ogni altra vita. - Umberto Saba (1909-10)
I talked to a goat she was tied up alone on the lawn sick of grass wet with rain she baa’d that baa matched exactly how I felt so I replied first as a joke then because pain’s endless it has a voice and never shuts up I heard it in that lonely goat in a goat with a long semitic face I heard the moan of every pain in every life

- trans. JR (2026)


Umberto Saba: Poesie (1911)


"The Goat" is one of Saba's most celebrated anthology pieces. As you can see, that tone of sardonic, world-weary irony began early in his work, and never really left him. There's something of the atmosphere of an Italian Thomas Hardy about him, though of course Saba had the added benefit of the long, brutal tradition of European anti-semitism to add to the mixture.

The poem, even so, is quite delightful. That image of Saba dutifully baa-ing to his long-faced interlocutor is irresistible, and this sense of an untainted, childish vision of the world as it is rather than as we talk it up to be is pervasive in his work overall.

His one, unfinished novel, Ernesto, prepared for posthumous publication by his daughter Linuccia, adds to this mélange the forbidden theme of adolescent homosexual love. He wrote: "I knew as soon as I'd written the first sentence that this wouldn't be for publication." The book is described as being:
largely autobiographical, including details about the title character's friendship and love for a violinist, and his attachment to his native Trieste. As one critic says: "he revisited not only the scenes but also the moods of his puberty".
Another critic, Aidan Higgins, has "classed its treatment of adolescent sexuality with the work of an earlier generation of writers, E. M. Forster's Maurice and Thomas Mann's Death in Venice."


Umberto Saba: Ernesto (1975)




Giuseppe Ungaretti (1888-1970) is one of the most influential and widely read Italian poets of the twentieth century. Probably only Nobel-Prize-winner Eugenio Montale could be said to rival his celebrity. Together with Saba, they constitute the "big three" major modernists in modern Italian poetry.

So why didn't he win the Nobel prize, rather than the far less famous Salvatore Quasimodo? The answer is simple: Fascism.

You'll find it distinctly downplayed in the bio-notes printed on most of his books, but Ungaretti was - at least for a time - a convinced follower of Mussolini. Like Saba, he wrote for Il Popolo d'Italia, but after the war his brief flirtations with Dadaism and other anti-establishment movements culminated in support for Mussolini's 1922 March on Rome.
Ungaretti joined the National Fascist Party, signing the pro-fascist Manifesto of the Italian Writers in 1925. In his essays of 1926–1929 ... he repeatedly called on the Duce to direct cultural development in Italy and reorganize the Italian Academy on fascist lines. He argued: "The first task of the Academy will be to reestablish a certain connection between men of letters, between writers, teachers, publicists. This people hungers for poetry. If it had not been for the miracle of Blackshirts, we would never have leaped this far." In his private letters to a French critic, Ungaretti also claimed that fascist rule did not imply censorship.

Giuseppe Ungaretti: Il porto sepolto (1916)


Mussolini even wrote a preface for the 1923 reprint of his 1916 book of free-verse war poems, Il porto sepolto [The Buried Port], "thus politicizing its message". While appalled by the realities of war, Ungaretti was not entirely - in his poems, at least - convinced of its futility, and preferred to emphasise the spirit of comradeship among the men.


Giuseppe Ungaretti: Il porto sepolto. Presentate da Benito Mussolini (1923)


As you can see from the example below - one of the most famous italian poems of the twentieth century - he had a lot in common poetically with his friend Guillaume Apollinaire. Perhaps the main difference is that he survived the war and Apollinaire didn't.

Mattina M'illumino d'immenso - Giuseppe Ungaretti (1917)
enlighten me immensity

- trans. JR (2026)


Reddit: Lost Generation Writers (2021)


Should we class him as a "lost generation" writer, then? The very diverse stances of the various writers of this era would would seem to make it plausible, but his politics remained less anti-establishment than most of theirs. The poem below is another case in point:

Soldati Si sta come d'autunno sugli alberi le foglie - Giuseppe Ungaretti (1917)
like leaves on autumn trees

- trans. JR (2026)


Ezra Pound: In a Station of the Metro (1913)


It clearly has much in common with Ezra Pound's imagist poem "In a Station of the Metro".


E. E. Cummings: l(a (1958)


But then, perhaps it's even more reminiscent of Cumming's late masterpiece "l(a". Or, for that matter, those lines of Eliot's from The Waste Land:
The river’s tent is broken: the last fingers of leaf
Clutch and sink into the wet bank
Like them but - at the same time - not so very much like them. The directness and originality of Ungaretti's vision is apparent, but his work lacks the melancholic sense of "a botched civilisation" so prevalent in that of these Anglo-American modernists.

Veglia Un'intera nottata buttato vicino a un compagno massacrato con la sua bocca digrignata volta al plenilunio con la congestione delle sue mani penetrata nel mio silenzio ho scritto lettere piene d'amore Non sono mai stato tanto attaccato alla vita - Giuseppe Ungaretti (1917)
a whole night laid beside a battered comrade fish mouth gaping at the moon with the touch of his hands upon my silence I scribbled letters full of love I’ve never felt so close to life

- trans. JR (2026)



Ungaretti travelled widely in the 1930s, eventually settling in Brazil, where he became a Professor of Italian at São Paulo University in 1936. However:
In 1942, three years after the start of World War II, Ungaretti returned to Axis-allied Italy, where he was received with honors by the officials. The same year, he was made a Professor of Modern Literature at the University of Rome. ... At the close of the war, following Mussolini's downfall, Ungaretti was expelled from the faculty owing to his fascist connections, but reinstated when his colleagues voted in favor of his return.
It's certainly a very different trajectory to that of Ezra Pound, who broadcast Fascist propaganda on Italian radio during the war, and was arrested for treason against his country in 1945.

However Pound was, too - if not forgiven, at least released from the psychiatric ward in which he'd been confined, in 1958. In the meantime he'd won the 1948 Bollingen Prize for his Pisan Cantos.


Ezra Pound: The Pisan Cantos (1948)


So what are we to conclude from all this? That political judgements have nothing to do with poetry? Not really, I think. I find that I do have a better feeling about Saba as a poet and as a man than I do about Ungaretti - despite the huge and continuing popularity of the latter - because of the times they lived through and the very different accommodations they made to those times.

It would be ridiculous to say that Ungaretti was undeserving of his fame, or that other poets were wrong to see him as a revivifying force in Italian poetry. The three pieces translated above revolutionised the literary scene in a way that few poems ever have. He's unignorable: far too lively to have to hang his head in shame for having supported Mussolini.

On the other hand his life-work doesn't (for me, at least) have quite the same lustre as Montale's or Quasimodo's - partly because they retained the courage to call out the evils of this totalitarian regime.

I don't doubt that Ungaretti was sincere in his beliefs - and he was clearly protean in the artistic stances he adopted - but, as in the case of Pound, there's a shadow there which can't profitably be ignored. I can read people without having to agree with them, but it does have an influence on my appreciation of their work. How could it not?

But then, we're all morally compromised in one way or another. Pound's statement on his political convictions made when he was arrested in 1945 may sound absurd to us now, but then we have the benefit of knowing far more about the Final Solution (not to mention the inner workings of Hitler's regime):
I am not anti-Semitic, and I distinguish between the Jewish usurer and the Jew who does an honest day's work for a living.
Hitler and Mussolini were simple men from the country. I think that Hitler was a Saint, and wanted nothing for himself. I think that he was fooled into anti-Semitism and it ruined him. That was his mistake. When you see the "mess" that Italy gets into by bumping off Mussolini, you will see why someone could believe in some of his efforts.





Umberto Saba (1951)

Umberto Poli ["Saba"]
(1883-1957)


Books I own are marked in bold:
    Poetry:

  1. Poesie (1911)
  2. Coi miei occhi (1912)
  3. A Gesu' bambino (1912)
  4. La serena disperazione (1920)
  5. Cose leggere e vaganti (1920)
  6. Il Canzoniere (1900-1921) (1921)
  7. Preludio e canzonette (1922)
  8. Figure e canti (1926)
  9. Preludio e fughe (1928)
  10. Tre poesie alla mia balia (1929)
  11. Ammonizione ed altre poesie. 1900-1910 (1932)
  12. Tre composizioni (1933)
  13. Parole (1934)
  14. Ultime cose 1900-1945 (1944)
  15. Il canzoniere (1900-1945) (1945)
  16. Mediterranee (1946)
  17. Il canzoniere (1900-1947) (1948)
  18. Uccelli (1950)
  19. Il canzoniere (1900-1954) (1961)
  20. Il piccolo Berto. 1929-1931 (1961)
  21. Il canzoniere del 1921. Ed. Giordano Castellani (1981)
  22. Tutte le poesie. Ed. Arrigo Stara (1988)
    • Tutte le Poesie. Ed. Arrigo Stara. Introduction by Mario Lavagetto. I Meridiani. 1988. Milano: Arnoldo Mondadori Editore, 2001.
  23. Il Canzoniere (1945) - Oltre il Canzoniere (1946-1957). Ed. Giuseppe Emiliano Bonura (2019)

  24. Prose:

  25. Autobiografia. I Prigioni (1923)
  26. Autobiografia. L'uomo [limited edition of 25 copies] (1926)
  27. Scorciatoie e raccontini (1946)
  28. Storia e cronistoria del Canzoniere (1948)
  29. Ricordi, racconti. 1910-1947 (1956)
  30. Epigrafe; Ultime prose. Ed. Giacomo Debenedetti (1959)
  31. Quello che resta da fare ai poeti (1959)
  32. Ernesto (1975)

  33. Works:

  34. Tutte le opere. 9 vols (1949-59)
    1. Poesie dell'adolescenza e giovanili. 1900-1910 (1949)
    2. Trieste e una donna. 1910-1912 (1950)
    3. La serena disperazione. 1913-1915 (1951)
    4. Cose leggere e vaganti. 1920. L'amorosa spina. 1920 (1952)
    5. Preludio e canzonette. 1922-1923 (1955)
    6. Autobiografia; I prigioni; Fanciulle; Cuor morituro; L'uomo. 1924-1930 (1959)
    7. Mediterranee (1957)
    8. Uccelli e Quasi un racconto. 1948-1951 (1951)
    9. Ricordi, racconti. 1910-1947 (1956)

  35. Letters:

  36. Il vecchio e il giovane. Carteggio 1930-1957, con Pier Antonio Quarantotti Gambini. Ed. Linuccia Saba (1965)
  37. Lettere ad una amica. Settantacinque lettere a Nora Baldi (1966)
  38. Saba, Svevo, Comisso. (Lettere inedite), con Italo Svevo e Giovanni Comisso. Ed. Mario Sutor (1968)
  39. L'adolescenza del Canzoniere e undici lettere, introduction by Sergio Miniussi. Notes by Folco Portinari (1975)
  40. Amicizia. Storia di un vecchio poeta e di un giovane canarino. (Quasi un racconto) 1951. [letters, facsimiles of manuscripts & typescripts]. Ed. Carlo Levi (1976)
  41. Lettere a un amico vescovo. Ed. Rienzo Colla. Introduction by Giovanni Fallani (1980)
  42. La spada d'amore. Lettere scelte 1902-1957. Ed. Aldo Marcovecchio (1983)
  43. Atroce paese che amo. lettere famigliari, 1945-1953. Ed. Gianfranca Lavezzi & Rossana Saccani (1987)
  44. Lettere sulla psicoanalisi. Carteggio con Joachim Flescher 1946-1949, con gli scritti di Saba sulla psicoanalisi, le lettere di Saba a Edoardo Weiss, due lettere di Weiss a Linuccia Saba. Ed. Arrigo Stara (1991)
  45. Lettere a Sandro Penna, 1929-1940. Ed. Roberto Deidier (1997)
  46. Quante rose a nascondere un abisso. Carteggio con la moglie (1905-1956), Album fotografico. Ed. Raffaella Acetoso (2004)
  47. Quanto hai lavorato per me, caro Fortuna! Lettere e amicizia fra Umberto Saba e Aldo Fortuna (1912-1944). Ed. Riccardo Cepach (2007)
  48. Il cerchio imperfetto. Lettere 1946-1954, con Vittorio Sereni. Ed. Cecilia Gibellini (2010)


Umberto Saba: Tutte le poesie (1988)





Giuseppe Ungaretti: Vita d'un uomo: 106 Poesie 1914-1960 (1970)

Giuseppe Ungaretti
(1888-1970)

Books I own are marked in bold:
    Poetry:

  1. Il porto sepolto (1916)
    • Il porto sepolto: Poesie. Presentate da Benito Mussolini. Con fregi di Francesco Gamba (1923)
  2. Natale (1916)
  3. La guerre. Une poésie (1919)
  4. Allegria di naufragi (1919)
  5. L'allegria (1931)
  6. Sentimento del tempo (1933)
  7. Poesie disperse [1915-1927] (1945)
  8. La guerra (1947)
  9. Il dolore. 1937-1946 (1947)
  10. Derniers Jours. 1919 (1947)
  11. La terra promessa. Frammenti (1950)
  12. Gridasti soffoco ... (1951)
  13. Un grido e paesaggi (1952)
  14. Les cinq livres: texte français établi par l'Auteur et Jean Lescure (1953)
  15. Il taccuino del vecchio (1960)
  16. Vita d’un uomo: 106 poesie 1914-1960 (1966)
    • Vita d’un uomo: 106 poesie 1914-1960. Introduzione di Giovanni Raboni. 1966. Gli Oscar. Arnoldo Mondadori Editore, 1970.
  17. [con Bruna Bianco] Dialogo (1968)
  18. Selected Poems. Trans. Patrick Creagh. Penguin Modern European Poets (1971)
    • Selected Poems. Trans. Patrick Creagh. Penguin Modern European Poets. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971.

  19. Prose:

  20. Il povero nella città (1949)
  21. Il deserto e dopo (1961)
  22. Saggi e interventi (1974)
  23. Invenzione della poesia moderna. Lezioni brasiliane di letteratura (1937-1942). Ed. Paola Montefoschi (1984)

  24. Translations:

  25. Traduzioni. Saint-John Perse, William Blake, Gongora, Esenin, Jean Paulhan, Affrica (1936)
  26. 22 sonetti di Shakespeare (1944)
  27. 40 sonetti di Shakespeare (1946)
  28. Da Góngora e da Mallarmé (1948)
  29. Jean Racine: Fedra (1950)
  30. Visioni di William Blake (1965)

  31. Works:

  32. Vita d'un uomo. 12 vols. Milano, A. Mondadori, 1942-65.
    1. L'allegria. 1914-1919 (1942)
    2. Sentimento del tempo. 1919-1935 (1943)
    3. Poesie disperse (1945)
    4. 40 sonetti di Shakespeare (1946)
    5. Il dolore. 1937-1946 (1947)
    6. Da Gongora e da Mallarmé (1948)
    7. Fedra di Jean Racine (1950)
    8. La Terra promessa. Frammenti (1954)
    9. Un grido e paesaggi (1954)
    10. Il taccuino del vecchio (1960)
    11. Il deserto e dopo. 1931-1946 (1961)
    12. Visioni di William Blake (1965)
  33. Tutte le poesie. Ed. Leone Piccioni. 1969 (Rev. ed. 2009)
  34. Album Ungaretti. Ed. Leone Piccioni (1989)
  35. Vita d'un uomo. Saggi e interventi. Ed. Mario Diacono e Luciano Rebay (1974)
  36. Vita d'un uomo. Viaggi e lezioni. Ed. Paola Montefoschi (2000)
  37. Vita d'un uomo. Traduzioni poetiche. Ed. Carlo Ossola & G. Radin (2010)

  38. Letters:

  39. Lettere dal fronte a Gherardo Marone (1916-1918). Ed. Armando Marone, Introduction by Leone Piccioni (1978)
  40. Lettere a Soffici, 1917-1930. Ed. Paola Montefoschi e Leone Piccioni (1981)
  41. Lettere a Enrico Pea. Ed. Jole Soldateschi. Introduction by Giorgio Luti (1983)
  42. G. Ungaretti - Giuseppe De Robertis, Carteggio 1931-1962, con un'Appendice di redazioni inedite di poesie di Ungaretti. Ed. Domenico De Robertis (1984)
  43. Lettere a Giovanni Papini. 1915-1948. Ed. Maria Antonietta Terzoli. Introduction by Leone Piccioni (1988)
  44. Correspondance Jean Paulhan, Giuseppe Ungaretti, 1921-1968. Ed. Jacqueline Paulhan, Luciano Rebay & Jean-Charles Vegliante. Preface by Luciano Rebay (1989)
  45. Vincenzo Cardarelli - G. Ungaretti, Lettere a Corrado Pavolini. Ed. F. Bernardini Napoletano & M. Mascia Galateria (1989)
  46. G. Ungaretti - Piero Bigongiari, Carteggio (1992)
  47. Lettere a Giuseppe Prezzolini 1911-1969,. Ed. Maria Antonietta Terzoli (2001)
  48. Piero Bigongiari - G. Ungaretti, «La certezza della poesia». Lettere (1942-1970). Ed. T. Spignoli (2008)
  49. Carlo Betocchi - G. Ungaretti, Lettere 1946-1970. Ed. E. Lima (2012)
  50. L'allegria è il mio elemento. Trecento lettere con Leone Piccioni, con una testimonianza di L. Piccioni. Ed. Silvia Zoppi Garampi (2013)
  51. Vittorio Sereni - G. Ungaretti, Un filo d'acqua per dissetarsi. Lettere 1949-1969. Ed. G. Palli Baroni (2013)
  52. Lettere dal fronte a Mario Puccini. Ed. F. De Nicola (2015)
  53. Luigi Nono - G. Ungaretti, Per un sospeso fuoco. Lettere 1950-1969. Ed. Paolo Dal Molin & Maria Carla Papini (2016)
  54. Lettere a Bruna [Bruna Angela Bianco]. Ed. Silvio Ramat (2017)
  55. Giuseppe Ungaretti in Borromeo, carteggio tra Cesare Angelini e Giuseppe Ungaretti. Ed. Fabio Maggi (2017)
  56. Le lettere di una vita 1909-1970. Ed. Francesca Bernardini Napoletano (2022)


Giuseppe Ungaretti: Vita d'un uomo: Tutte le Poesie (1970)





Wednesday, August 05, 2026

Odyssey/s


Christopher Nolan, dir. & writ.: The Odyssey (2026)
[Warning - numerous plot spoilers ahead]:

Is Homer's Odyssey really filmable? It's inspired innumerable genre paintings over the ages, so it could certainly be claimed to lend itself to fanciful reimaginings ...

John William Waterhouse: Circe Offering the Cup to Odysseus (1891)



Christopher Nolan: Samantha Morton as Circe (2026)





Arnold Böcklin: Odysseus und Kalypso (1883)



Christopher Nolan: Charlize Theron as Calypso (2026)





Herbert James Draper: Ulysses and the Sirens (1909)



Christopher Nolan: The Sirens (2026)





Pintoricchio: Penelope with the Suitors (c.1509)



Christopher Nolan: Anne Hathaway as Penelope (2026)


The contrast between paintings and movie stills makes it clear just how comparatively restrained and austere Christopher Nolan's new movie is. Is it faithful to the source material? Not particularly, no. You constantly notice, as you go along, little bits of rewriting or reemphasis: whole sections - such as Odysseus's sojourn with Nausicaä and the Phaeacians: the original context for the hero's retelling of his own adventures to date - gone missing.


Jean Veber: Ulysses and Nausicaa (1888)


But does that really matter? Homer's Odyssey is, after all, immensely long - far too full of incident for all of it to be embodied in a single film. What's more, in Christopher Nolan's twenty-first century version of the tale he's hardly likely to indulge us with a gross-out scene of Odysseus hanging all the poor put-upon maids in the palace after the massacre of Penelope's rapey suitors. No, Nolan's intention throughout is to interrogate and question the motives for violence in this society - and, by extension, our own.


Margaret Atwood: The Penelopiad (2015)




Homer: The Odyssey. Trans. Emily Wilson (2017)


I'd been planning to continue my piece on Christopher Nolan's Odyssey by contrasting it with some of the earlier screen versions of the poem - with side-references to my own attempt at a listing of the principal English versions of Homer - but then classical scholar Emily Wilson's rather caustic review of Nolan's movie came out.

I'm afraid that my first reaction took the form of a short satirical epigram (along the lines of John Byrom’s famous piece about the rivalry between eighteenth century musicians George Frideric Handel and Giovanni Bononcini):



Tweedledum and Tweedledee

Some say, compar’d to Bononcini
That Mynheer Handel’s but a Ninny
Others aver, that he to Handel
Is scarcely fit to hold a Candle
Strange all this Difference should be
‘Twixt Tweedle-dum and Tweedle-dee!


Christopher Nolan vs. Emily Wilson

Some say that unlike Emily
Nolan stuffed up his Odyssey
others say unlike Christopher
Wilson believes she is Homer
strange all this difference should be
'twixt cine-him and scribble-she

Robbie Collin: Emily Wilson on Nolan's Odyssey (30/7/26)





Victor Boyko: Christopher Nolan (15/7/2026)


That may not be an adequate response, however. Wilson makes a number of points which are hard to dispute: there isn't nearly as much sex as in the original, and the food doesn't look that appetising ... Whether that's enough to justify panning the film altogether is another question, one which I'll try to discuss in more detail below.

For the moment, though, I think I should declare an interest. I've been a Christopher Nolan fan virtually from the beginning, which is bound to prejudice me in his favour to some extent. Certainly I've been following his work with increasing awe from Memento (2000) onwards.

It's hard to think of a movie of his since then that I haven't admired, or at the very least- Interstellar, Tenet - found intriguing. He is, in my opinion, a genius: one of those very few talents born to transform the art of cinema rather than simply add new items to it.



Having said that, even Homer nods, and I have to say that I wasn't particularly impressed by Dunkirk's stagey theatrics. But his Batman trilogy! And the fascinating wheels within wheels of The Prestige! Not to mention his most recent triumph, where all his skills seem to come together almost miraculously, Oppenheimer!

So where does The Odyssey stand on that scale? It's probably too early to say. So far, however, the indications look pretty good:
On review aggregation website Rotten Tomatoes, 94% of 466 critics' reviews are positive, with an average rating of 8.7/10. The website's consensus reads: "Reinvigorating an ancient adventure with majestic sweep and sterling work by its colossal ensemble, Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey imbues myth with primal human feeling." It is Nolan's highest-rated film on the website.
I wanted to feel like that - wanted to be able to rate it as high on my own list as Inception, which astonished me continuously from beginning to end, and must surely rank as one of the greatest SF films of all time.

There's a melancholy, world-weary tone to The Odyssey. It seems to lack that visceral sense of adventure that inspired so many of his earlier films. Having said that, I'm curious - now - to see it again, perhaps this time on an IMAX screen, and find out how it strikes me the second time round.


Christopher Nolan: Tom Holland as Telemachus (2026)


However, it did succeed in moving me to tears: just once. Unsurprisingly, it was in the scene where Odysseus is reunited with his aged hunting dog Argus, and his son Telemachus, at that moment, understands who this white-bearded beggar actually is.

I have to say that Tom Holland was excellent in the role of Telemachus - not at all the usual sulky brat. He played it with dignity and grace. Lupita Nyong'o, too, achieved an unexpected triumph in her double cameo as Helen and her twin sister Clytemnestra.


Christopher Nolan: Lupita Nyong'o as Helen (2026)



The title chosen for Emily Wilson's review of Nolan's Odyssey, "An Uncomplicated Man", is presumably intended as an allusion to the first line of her own 2017 translation of the poem: "Tell me about a complicated man."

A good deal of ink has been spilled on the deliberately provocative modernity of this choice of words on her part, a distinct contrast to Robert Fagles' "man of twists and turns", Richmond Lattimore's "man of many ways", or even Alexander Pope's "man for wisdom's various arts renowned". She is, in other words, no stranger to controversy. This piece is no exception:
Nolan’s Odyssey lacks many of the elements that make the poem great. It has nothing convincing to say about time, memory, history, war, or about the relationship between one warrior’s glorious return and the lives of his family, adversaries, comrades, friends and neighbours. It lacks psychological, emotional, political and ethical depth. Its narrative structure is gimmicky. The writing is abysmal. None of the characters has convincing motivation for their actions or words. There are no sex scenes, and all the food looks horrible.
Not to mention the fact that the dog dies, but not before his "adorableness as a puppy is predictably amped up to suit our animal-loving times." Not even the cuteness of a puppy is exempt from the wrath of this particular reviewer, it would appear ...

I'm afraid that she rather lost me with her next complaint about the movie, however:

The most troubling ethical problem with Nolan’s Odyssey concerns the decision to film part of the movie in the occupied territory of Western Sahara, thus normalising the ongoing violence against the indigenous Sahrawi people. It is particularly galling that Nolan used this land simply as a visually striking backdrop for a film that centres, aggrandises and redeems the hero of a territorial war on account of his belated and partial acknowledgment of his own guilt.
This piece of moral one-upmanship sounds quite damning at first - until you begin to break it down. The "most troubling ethical problem" with the film is that it concerns war crimes, and yet was (partially) filmed in a debatable land rife with war crimes? Pardon me, but are there any parts of the globe that aren't past (or present) sites of crimes against humanity?

Emily Wilson is (according to her Wikipedia page) a professor of classical studies at the University of Pennsylvania, which is a "private Ivy League research university in Philadelphia." Philadelphia, originally named "Shackamaxon", was originally inhabited by the Lenape, also known as the Delaware Indians, who were "pushed out of the region during the 18th century as the original Thirteen Colonies expanded". I like that term "pushed out" - it sounds so much better than "ethnically cleansed" ...



Does she mention this disturbing history at the opening of each of her publications? I doubt it. And yet it's now become the custom in more recently colonised countries, such as Australia and New Zealand, to acknowledge the traditional owners of the land before beginning any public proceedings. Perhaps she and her institution should follow suit.

In any case, is this really the "most troubling ethical problem with Nolan’s Odyssey"? Surely there are a lot of other moral and economic concerns associated with any big Hollywood production which should worry us before this particular detail about one of the locations chosen for the movie?

Isn't the ideological hegemony exerted by the American film industry - and by American capitalism in general - of rather more significance than this absurdly strained piece of right-on-ism about the Western Sahara? The obscene gap between overpaid actors and underpaid contractors in our culture, for instance?

Once you start down these rabbitholes of grievance there's no end to them. It you want to blame Christopher Nolan for 'ignoring' the terrible ongoing human rights abuses taking place in the Western Sahara, why not hold him personally responsible for all the other innumerable injustices in the structure of our society? Or yourself, for that matter.
Despite all this, the release of The Odyssey is still an event to celebrate. In what we are told is the streaming era, this epic is bringing audiences back to cinemas. In what we are told is a time of declining literacy and the ‘death of the humanities’, translations of The Odyssey, including mine, are flying off the shelves. Some of those who buy the book or show up in cinemas to watch Tom Holland may go on to study ancient Greek. Perhaps the film will persuade a few college administrators not to cut their literature, language and history departments. Nolan, who studied English at University College London – where students still study The Odyssey as a first year ‘foundational text’ – is doing his best to get the general public reading again, and I am grateful.
"In what we are told is the streaming era" ... I'm a decade or so older than Emily Wilson (presently in her mid-50s: a year younger than Christopher Nolan), but I hope that even I don't sound as much of an old fogey as that. I've even managed to stop calling films "flickers" and e-vehicles "horseless carriages". This last paragraph - especially that coy line about how "translations ... including mine, are flying off the shelves" - reads like a deliberate parody of what elderly academics are supposed to sound like. Its closest cousin must surely be Jim Dixon's tortuously insincere "Merrie England" speech in Kingsley Amis's Lucky Jim - written in the mid-1950s, at the height of the "Angry Young Man" era:
... I say to you that something can be done by each one of us here tonight. Each of us can resolve to do something, every day, to resist the application of manufactured standards, to protest against ugly articles of furniture and table-ware, to speak out against sham architecture, to resist the importation into more and more public places of loudspeakers relaying the Light Programme, to say one word against the Yellow Press, against the best-seller, against the theatre-organ, to say one word for the instinctive culture of the integrated village-type community. In that way we shall be saying a word, however small in its individual effect, for our native tradition, for our common heritage, in short, for what we once had and may, some day, have again – Merrie England.

Kingsley Amis: Lucky Jim (1954)





Anne Dacier: L’Odyssée d’Homere (1716)


It's interesting how Emily Wilson's twin versions of the Odyssey and Iliad have been so insistently marketed as the first complete translations by a woman - the implication being that they're therefore bound to provide us with many fresh insights obscured through the ages by patriarchal misogyny.

I have no particular quarrel with that line of reasoning. It's certainly been very effective in selling these two new versions in an already overstocked market. But it's important to note the proviso: the first complete translations into English verse by a woman.

That mightn't seem to make much difference to monoglot English speakers, but it's perhaps worth pausing here to celebrate the earlier achievements of (for example) the inspired and audacious Anne Le Fèvre, more commonly known as Mme Anne Dacier:


Marie Victoire Jaquotot: Madame Dacier (1651-1720)
In 1711, her prose translation of the Iliad appeared, which earned her the esteem in which she is held in French literature. It was followed in 1716 by a similar translation of the Odyssey. Alexander Pope found these two works very useful for his own translations (Iliad (1715-1720) and Odyssey (1725–1726)). Dacier in turn published, in her second edition of the Iliad, remarks on Pope's translation of the same, which gained her some fame in England as well.

Anne Dacier: 'L'Iliade d’Homere (1711)


Dacier, like Wilson, was a considerable classical scholar and (again like Wilson) by no means averse to controversy:
In 1714, [Antoine] La Motte, who could not read Greek, published a poetical version of the Iliad, abridged and altered to suit his own taste, together with a Discours sur Homère ("Discourse on Homer"), stating the reasons why Homer failed to satisfy his critical taste. Dacier replied in the same year in her work, Des causes de la corruption du goût ("Of the Causes of the Corruption of Taste"). In defending Homer, Dacier "developed her own philosophical aesthetics. She insists on the centrality of taste as an indicator of the level of civilization, both moral and artistic, within a particular culture."
In the eyes of some male pundits, however, this ability to read Homer in the original was a handicap rather than an advantage:
Enlightenment philosopher Immanuel Kant, in his Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime, critiqued learned women of the time, including Mme. Dacier stating: "A Woman who has a head full of Greek, like Mme. Dacier, or who conducts disputations about mechanics, like the Marquise du Châtelet might as well also wear a beard; for that might perhaps better express the mien of depth for which they strive."

Politics & Prose: Emily Wilson & the Iliad (2024)





New Yorker: Joyce Carol Oates (2020)


The one thing that Christopher Nolan seems to understand most intimately - since it's at the heart of so many of his films - is the danger of hubris. You'd think Emily Wilson might fear it too. But she does persist, perversely, in crossing powerful goddesses.

Her review of The Odyssey, for instance, appears to have offended those three most terrifying words in the English language, Joyce Carol Oates, who complains that Wilson's "tone of dismissal & haughty superiority strike a sour note":
rather than disagreeing with interpretations of Homer in a collegial manner, this person, who has benefited enormously from Nolan’s film, speaks in the crude language of MAGA folks attacking someone with ideas that differ from hers. within the world of translators this seems all the more surprising since all translations are, presumably, subjective & not equivalent to the original text. one would expect a translator, of all people, beholden to a text, in service to a text, to be just a wee bit more thoughtful & respectful of others who are acting in good faith just as (she would claim) she is.
It might be a bit of a stretch to include Wilson in the ranks of "MAGA folks" simply on the strength of this one review, but I can see what Oates means. She goes on to say that she sees:
no reason why Nolan, or anyone else, should not re-imagine/re-envision a classical hero through the prism of his own invention. Homer’s “noble” Odysseus does not really seem so noble to contemporary readers who are likely to think of, for instance, Lt. William Calley in such lines: “From Ilion I was borne by a wind toward the Kikones –/ To Ismaros. There I laid waste the city and killed the men./ After dragging their wives from the city – with a great deal of booty as well –/ We divided it up …” (Book 9, Mendelsohn translation) No remorse here, just swaggering male braggadocio typical of “noble Odysseus” – “Odysseus, that cunning man”; but still, in Nolan’s vision, even such a man is capable of conscience & remorse eventually. in the 1997 adaptation it is pride that Odysseus must overcome; in Nolan’s version, it is conscience ...

Andrei Konchalovsky, dir.: The Odyssey (TV mini-series, 1997)


Oates concludes by saying:
I do not think that Nolan’s film will be considered a great classic but really, it seems that whatever Nolan did, it would disappoint hordes of people. most moviemakers/creators just try the best they can – it seems odd that this director has drawn such angry criticism.
She goes on to note that such criticism
is chilling, dampening for any creative artist. to attack a creative artist as if he were a criminal, had done something to harm, hurt, kill – this is alarming. if you hate a movie, fine – no need to recommend it. no one expects every work of art to be a classic, perfect … rage seems just weirdly inappropriate.

The New York Times: The Inscrutable Brilliance of Anne Carson (2013)


This is not the first time that Emily Wilson has wilfully courted the wrath of the White Goddess. She began her review of poetry diva Anne Carson's recent poetry collection Wrong Norma as follows:


Anne Carson: Wrong Norma (2024)
Write about trauma. Write about loneliness. Write about grief. Write about nature. Write about the body. Invoke universals. Make it mythic. Tell it slant. Do not use rhyme. Do not use meter. Use short lines. Leave a lot of space on the page. Juxtapose your words with quivery line drawings in ink or paint or collage.

If you want to produce poetry that a large subset of American teenagers and twentysomethings will adore with a passion verging on religious devotion, these simple rules provide your best hope.
By comparison with this little effort, Wilson's strictures on Nolan's Odyssey begin to sound like a love-letter. She does, after all, admit a certain gratitude to him for increasing the sales of her own version of the poem.

It would be impertinent of me to question Wilson's views on Ancient Greek, though she does seem to permit herself a certain telescoping of eras in pointing out just what Nolan has got wrong in his version of Homer - himself many centuries distant from the quasi-historical events he recounted. I would say, though, that the following passage shows an ignorance of contemporary poetry on a far grander scale than any of the solecisms she detects in Nolan's movie:


National Arts Centre: Margaret Atwood (2012)
Of the three prominent writers who have triumphantly followed this track [i.e. the "simple rules" listed in her first paragraph], the most senior, born 1939, is Margaret Atwood, who has published 18 books of melancholic, reflective poetry, at least one including her own, quirky art, that often juxtapose contemporary experiences with allusions to ancient and medieval fables and myths. The youngest, born 1992, is Rupi Kaur, whose work has an enormous following, especially among young people on social media. Many readers with no interest in any other poetry — including one of my own daughters — have found a kind of spiritual salvation in Kaur’s visceral, poetic evocations of the struggles of young womanhood.

Baljit Singh: Rupi Kaur (2024)


Margaret Atwood is a famous novelist. Her poetry, while certainly highly regarded, is hardly in the mainstream of contemporary verse. As for bestselling "insta-poet" Rupi Kaur, comparing her clichéd banalities to the work of the multi-award-winning Carson can only be seen as a deliberate insult. Juxtaposing the two poets is about as intelligent as equating Keith Haring with Johannes Vermeer.

But that, of course, is Wilson's rather less than subtle point.
Be Canadian. Be zany. Be moody. Be relatable. Write about your mother. Write about desire. Write about trauma. Write about loneliness. Write about grief. Write about nature. Write about the body. Invoke universals. Make it mythic.
Atwood, Kaur, and Carson are all indubitably Canadian. Does that make them all alike as poets? Not entirely, Wilson concedes. "What distinguishes Carson from her more pop-inclined compatriots is her clear interest in disguise, performance, and experimentation with genre."
Like many of us, Carson uses writing to find out what she thinks; but the means of production do not always need to be preserved in the finished product. You can throw the ladder away after you make the climb.
"Like many of us" ... a horrible truth begins to dawn at this point. The author of a competent translation of Homer in rather jog-trot pentameters actually considers herself a poet on the same level as the tirelessly innovative Carson. She goes on:
I have been told that Carson, preparing to give a talk onstage, has been spotted in the green room, speaking to herself and saying over and over, ‘I am Anne Carson. I am Anne Carson' ... The performance of her own personal identity, on the page as well as onstage, is a site of struggle and artistry.

Camille Paglia: Vamps and Tramps (1994)


This is just silly - and offensive as well. It puts me a mind a little of Camille Paglia's painfully embarrassing acccount of her attempts as a young grad student to impress Susan Sontag, whom she'd managed to entrap into taking a car journey with her. Sontag, understandably, found it difficult to understand why her interlocutor seemed to want to be her, to upstage her, and to kill her, all at the same time.

The penny drops at last. These frantic cries for attention are Emily Wilson's version of the anxiety of influence. Anne Carson's sin lies in being a classicist and a widely acclaimed poet, whereas Wilson is regarded as (at best) a competent versifier. The worst thing of all is the fact that Carson doesn't appear to have noticed this foolish attack on her.

When asked later about Paglia's vitriolic denunciations of her, Sontag, too, is reported to have said: "Who's Camille Paglia?"


Danielle Binks: Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey (17/7/2026)


But Christopher Nolan's sin is even more grievous. Remember that quote near the top of my page? "I would be ashamed to have written any part of this script." Despite offering, early on, some tepid praise of her version, which he claimed had influenced his script, he didn't ask her to help. She might have been ashamed to have written it in its present form, but you can be sure that she had a kick-ass version in her head, all ready to go at the press of a button (so does Elon Musk, we're told: his is gonna be untold better than Nolan's, it'll be made it with AI, and he'll be getting Mel Gibson to direct it ...)

Her Odyssey was highly praised, but it came out nearly ten years ago now and the bloom has started to fade. So, instead of writing a Hollywood blockbuster, why not translate it again, only this time much better? There's a new article out about that now, too: "Why Emily Wilson Is Translating The Odyssey — Again":
I wouldn’t have done this and then be doing it all over again if I didn’t think the whole thing is awesome.
Awesome indeed. Once was enough for Alexander Pope, and William Cowper - even for T. E. Lawrence ... but "with her second version, Wilson intends to honor the poetic traditions of the English language". This Harper's Bazaar article, too (alas) begins with that familiar exaggeration:
Wilson first completed her version of Homer’s epic poem in 2017, becoming the first woman ever to publish a translation of the story.
Except for Anne Dacier's and Rosa Calzecchi Onesti's complete translations of both the Iliad and the Odyssey, that is - not to mention Caroline Alexander's earlier Iliad.


Caroline Alexander: The Iliad (2015)





Uberto Pasolini, dir.: The Return (2024)


But then, Christopher Nolan has his predecessors, too - not that he's ever sought to conceal the fact. Among the various recent cinematic versions of the Odyssey, I'd like to single out Uberto Pasolini's The Return: a detailed version of the final twelve books of the epic. It's important to remember that no less than half of Homer's poem is devoted to Odysseus' return to Ithaca, so treating the subject in such depth was his idea, not Pasolini's.

My first thought on seeing this film was that it was meant as a deliberate echo of such classic Pier Paolo Pasolini movies as Il fiore delle Mille e una notte (1974), part of his trilogy of life (The Decameron, The Canterbury Tales, and the Arabian Nights).

Like them, it seems to move in a world of pre-existing landscapes rather than carefully modelled sets. The characters, too, underact as much as possible: preferring to let the gradually unfolding story speak for itself.

It came as a bit of surprise to me to discover that Uberto Pasolini is no relation of Pier Paolo. Instead, he's the nephew of Luchino Visconti, director of The Leopard (1963) and Death in Venice (1971). But that doesn't really seem to offer us much of a clue to his intentions - and neither does the fact that his past credits include producing quintessential British movie The Full Monty (1997) and directing the little gem Still Life:


imdb: Uberto Pasolini (1957- )


There's a certain intimacy about many of the scenes in The Return which might recall Still Life, in fact. But perhaps it's the writing team we should really be concerning ourselves with.

They include veteran screenwriter John Collee, a sure hand at a big screen epic - his credits include Master and Commander (2003) (directed by Peter Weir); the Charles Darwin bio-pic Creation (2009); Hotel Mumbai (2018); and Kate Winslet's Lee (2023).


Edward Bond (1934- 2024)


But of course the crucial figure there is legendary British playwright Edward Bond. His 50-odd plays include such masterpieces as Lear (1971), a rewritten, more class-conscious version of Shakespeare's King Lear; and Narrow Road to the Deep North (1968), set in the haiku poet Bashō's Japan, and notorious at the time as "The One With Five Dead Babies and a Disembowelling".

Pasolini (and Bond)'s is a brutal vision of the rottenness of the state of Ithaka in the absence of its king, and his version of the death of the suitors seems to go on forever. Otherwise, the two directors, Nolan and Pasolini, present suprisingly similar visions of Odysseus's Mycenaean hill-fort - and the impossible dilemma of their respective resplendent Penelopes, Juliette Binoche and Anne Hathaway.




Derek Walcott: The Odyssey: A Stage Version (1993)

"The future happens. No matter how much we scream
― Derek Walcott, The Odyssey


Which leaves me, for my final dramatised Odyssey, with Nobel-Prize-winning poet Derek Walcott's epic play, originally commissioned by the Royal Shakespeare Company, but recently revived for a new production in Houston, Texas:


Melissa Taylor: Shawn Hamilton as Blind Billy Blue (2023)


As local theatre critic Chris Vogner describes it:
Alley Theatre artistic director Rob Melrose was mesmerized when he saw Derek Walcott’s Odyssey in London back in 1993. Walcott had taken Homer’s epic poem about love and longing for home and given it a jolt and a lilt from his native Saint Lucia, spicing the work with Caribbean flavor. It was a follow-up of sorts to Walcott’s Omeros, a postcolonial meditation that borrowed characters and themes from Homer’s Iliad. But where Omeros was a sort of homage to Homer, this Odyssey was the real deal.
Rob Melrose goes on to say:
“It's one of my favorite stories of all time,” he said. “I have a Greek scholar friend who said, ‘There are two kinds of people in the world. There are Iliad people and there are Odyssey people. The Iliad is about war and fighting and strife, and The Odyssey is about adventure and romance and love. I'm definitely an Odyssey person. It's so wondrous, the way it's about a father and a son and a husband and a wife, and all the creatures and goddesses he comes across in his journeys.”

Derek Walcott: The poet laid bare (1992)


That seems to me a very pertinent remark. Having recently read Walcott's play for the first time, and fresh from my viewings of both Uberto Pasolini's and Christopher Nolan's films, I'd have to admit that I, too, am an Odyssey person.

I understand the arguments in favour of the Iliad. Structurally, it makes more sense as a story, and its range of emotions and depth of understanding of human nature are probably even greater than those supplied by the Odyssey. But the Odyssey offers hope where the Iliad has little or none. Against all odds, Odysseus does return, does defeat his enemies. He even succeeds in placating the gods he's offended for long enough to earn one more night in his tree-bound bed with his faithful wife.

It offers, in the end, a more ecumenical, more inclusive view of the world than the relentless tragic truths of the Iliad. And it's always been open to endless new interpretations and readings. Nolan, Pasolini, Walcott, and Wilson are all part of that story. Of course they all prefer their own recreations to those of their rivals: that's their privilege - but surely, for the rest of us, the more versions we have of it the better?

There may or may not have been a single poetic genius called Homer, and he/she/they may or may not have written both the Iliad and the Odyssey. The arguments on that subject have been going on now for more than two thousand years. What we do have is the poems themselves. So let's just be grateful for that, and cut it out with all this pointless infighting.


Christopher Nolan, dir.: The Odyssey (2026)